I was thinking one day, I wonder why they haven't re-made Hard Target yet. They remade everything else and that movie was pretty sick when I was a kid. I know today it's half dog shit but it still stands up a bit, hunched over on one leg but it still stands.
what the fuck is this? straight to dvd bullshit! No Van Damme either. Hate it when fuckers make sequels without any of the original cast. What a let down. Ain't wasting my time watching this pish
One thing this has on the first movie, at least it seems to explain why the hero is so good at fighting. In the first one, Van Damme was a drifter who just happened to pull off amazing 360 spin kicks. Not that I'm complaining.
LOL all you guys talking about how adkins is nothing compared to JCVD, and how this sequel wasnt requested. Yall need to shut up lol its a movie thats coming straight to dvd and you arent paying anything to watch it in the cinema, the least you can do is shut up about ur shitty opinions as no one cares. if u wana watch it go for it but if not then just dont watch it. However most u fuckers probably are gonna watch it as it is free but still posting hate because a not-so-big actor is the lead and the film doesnt cost that much to make. kys.
Of course they had to add a roundhouse kicking dual gun wielding chick that's just as badass as the boys. This femicunt dyke agenda is getting real tiresome.
-Rhona Mitra is turning into the typical 40+, skinny, tons of makeup, actor stereotype. This really sucks. She has always been such a beautiful lady. Hardly recognized her in this movie. Oh, and they actually want you to believe that Rhona's character, all 100 pounds of her, can go toe to toe with Scott Adkins in a fight. So bad. -Really bad, stupid casting of the Burmese lady with the elephants. She has a sexy British accent? -Very bad movie but might be a guilty pleasure for some (as long as you can fast forward). Lord, this was bad.
Before John Woo almost destroyed Tom Cruse's career and the Mission Impossible movie franchise, this was one of his films that he made right. I'll check his movie out even if it sucks, 22 years later we get a straight to DVD sequel. The first film while it was good for its time it holds nostalgia in my mind and I'm willing to waste 2 more hours of my life whit hang this movie even if it films sucks!
I remember when this was even better than the first Hard Target, and it was called Surviving the Game (with Iced-T). That was great, because at least T didn't know how to fight. He had to figure shit out.
The movie had very good cinematic level, great camera work, scenes, locations, had good action, and the main villain by Robert Knepper was super well delivered (best performance in this picture, other than I'm a huge fan of Scott) and I couldn't but to notice: It almost could have been a great movie!
If not for the problem of absolutely crappy logic glue holding the scenes together. The big story, fine. But so much illogical unrealistic scenes were forced into the movie for some weird reasons, made it feel like they forced the script like in that game when a teacher gives you a list of words or expressions and you have to write a story that incorporates it: "camel", "vanilla ice cream", "The pen is mightier than the sword", "toothbrush", "The squeaky wheel gets the grease", "propulsion engine". Now go write a great story, just make sure to use all of these words!
If the story was a realistic, believable fiction, then this would be an awesome tribute to the original. The filming had to facilitate a very very poor script (logic wise).
You see, Chance Boudreaux was a war veteran, so you watch him just know some things and you don't ask why he does know all this – well, he's a war veteran. But Wes Baylor is a ring fighter, how on Earth does he know the stuff he knows in the movie? Not any hate towards Scott, but the story is so poorly written.
The Tha and her brother are poor villagers in a middle of jungle yet they are well spoken in English.
The General, LOL, the amount of incredible lack of logic behind what script writers made this character be is just beyond disappointing.
Robert Knepper did really deliver great acting, but even he had to struggle with the fact that script writers got on some insane intoxication when working on the story, like in the sushi scene.
And the character of Sofia was so unrealistic that Rhona Mitra had no chance in saving it. The only way for that character to work would be if it was not played by an action actress like Rhona but a sophisticated drama performer at the level of Jack Nicholson in The Shining, to picture some sort of psychopathic/narcissistic Sofia in a psychological thriller setting.
I just want to add, that I am so disappointed because:
1. The original Hard Target was really a good movie 2. So would be the Hard Target 2 if only for good writers 3. I'm a huge Scott's fan and I wish he could work with better scripts
boyka target:)
No John Woo. No Van Damme. No Lance Henrickson or Arnold Vosloo. Yah, this movie is going to suck.
Where's all the gun action? Van Damme only kicked a couple of people in Hard Target. The rest was John Woo gunplay. Unless Mitra gets HER guns out….
I was thinking one day, I wonder why they haven't re-made Hard Target yet. They remade everything else and that movie was pretty sick when I was a kid. I know today it's half dog shit but it still stands up a bit, hunched over on one leg but it still stands.
Nope
Rhona Mitra and Scott Adkins deserves better than this.
I can't wait until Scott Adkins movie "Boyka: Undisputed" comes out this year.
Guys, let me tell you the truth.
Myanmar official army is worse than in this movie.
They are licensed to rape girlS!!!!!!!
READ THE BOOK ABOUT "LICENSE TO RAPE".
what the fuck is this? straight to dvd bullshit! No Van Damme either. Hate it when fuckers make sequels without any of the original cast. What a let down. Ain't wasting my time watching this pish
This is going straight to the bargain bin at Target.
Scott Adkins? I'm in.
No fucking way I AM DREAMING!
yuri boyka in action again!
main reason not to make sequels…. nothing to do with the first one…. just stop…. stop…. STOP!!!!!
just watched it, and I liked it… good action movie, white doves & slo-mo included 😉
this looks like pure shit – but ok, I'll give it a go. Just have to prep for hung over movie day…
One thing this has on the first movie, at least it seems to explain why the hero is so good at fighting. In the first one, Van Damme was a drifter who just happened to pull off amazing 360 spin kicks. Not that I'm complaining.
Este tipo esta siguiendo los pasos de Jean claude van damme
LOL all you guys talking about how adkins is nothing compared to JCVD, and how this sequel wasnt requested. Yall need to shut up lol its a movie thats coming straight to dvd and you arent paying anything to watch it in the cinema, the least you can do is shut up about ur shitty opinions as no one cares. if u wana watch it go for it but if not then just dont watch it. However most u fuckers probably are gonna watch it as it is free but still posting hate because a not-so-big actor is the lead and the film doesnt cost that much to make. kys.
Is it any good?
Of course they had to add a roundhouse kicking dual gun wielding chick that's just as badass as the boys.
This femicunt dyke agenda is getting real tiresome.
i love low cost
-Rhona Mitra is turning into the typical 40+, skinny, tons of makeup, actor stereotype. This really sucks. She has always been such a beautiful lady. Hardly recognized her in this movie. Oh, and they actually want you to believe that Rhona's character, all 100 pounds of her, can go toe to toe with Scott Adkins in a fight. So bad.
-Really bad, stupid casting of the Burmese lady with the elephants. She has a sexy British accent?
-Very bad movie but might be a guilty pleasure for some (as long as you can fast forward). Lord, this was bad.
Such a crap movie…
Adkins is one of the baddest motherfuckers of all time
Scott Adkins is a best fighter !! and the movie is amazing is too !!
If the main bad guy doesn't unscrew the fuse out of a grenade, it'll hurt my uh … feelings.
Before John Woo almost destroyed Tom Cruse's career and the Mission Impossible movie franchise, this was one of his films that he made right. I'll check his movie out even if it sucks, 22 years later we get a straight to DVD sequel. The first film while it was good for its time it holds nostalgia in my mind and I'm willing to waste 2 more hours of my life whit hang this movie even if it films sucks!
That fighting looks so unnatural and shit. And what a random, fake sequel to make.
I remember when this was even better than the first Hard Target, and it was called Surviving the Game (with Iced-T). That was great, because at least T didn't know how to fight. He had to figure shit out.
Fuck all respect for the audience
Randal Randal Randal!!!
What chance do they have against the most complete fighter in the world?
a lot of Adkins movies are cleche AF, but I only like the undisputed trilogy and the first ninja film he made
With acting that bad who wouldn't pay to hunt him?
he is a fighter not a hunter
Asiiik banget euyy ..rame
some unknown dude, some ugly bitch, no van damme, who would want to watch that?
The movie had very good cinematic level, great camera work, scenes,
locations, had good action, and the main villain by Robert Knepper was
super well delivered (best performance in this picture, other than I'm
a huge fan of Scott) and I couldn't but to notice: It almost could have
been a great movie!
If not for the problem of absolutely crappy logic glue holding the
scenes together. The big story, fine. But so much illogical unrealistic
scenes were forced into the movie for some weird reasons, made it feel
like they forced the script like in that game when a teacher gives you
a list of words or expressions and you have to write a story that
incorporates it: "camel", "vanilla ice cream", "The pen is mightier
than the sword", "toothbrush", "The squeaky wheel gets the grease",
"propulsion engine". Now go write a great story, just make sure to use
all of these words!
If the story was a realistic, believable fiction, then this would be an
awesome tribute to the original. The filming had to facilitate a very
very poor script (logic wise).
You see, Chance Boudreaux was a war veteran, so you watch him just know
some things and you don't ask why he does know all this – well, he's a
war veteran. But Wes Baylor is a ring fighter, how on Earth does he
know the stuff he knows in the movie? Not any hate towards Scott, but
the story is so poorly written.
The Tha and her brother are poor villagers in a middle of jungle yet
they are well spoken in English.
The General, LOL, the amount of incredible lack of logic behind what
script writers made this character be is just beyond disappointing.
Robert Knepper did really deliver great acting, but even he had to
struggle with the fact that script writers got on some insane
intoxication when working on the story, like in the sushi scene.
And the character of Sofia was so unrealistic that Rhona Mitra had no
chance in saving it. The only way for that character to work would be
if it was not played by an action actress like Rhona but a
sophisticated drama performer at the level of Jack Nicholson in The
Shining, to picture some sort of psychopathic/narcissistic Sofia in a
psychological thriller setting.
I just want to add, that I am so disappointed because:
1. The original Hard Target was really a good movie
2. So would be the Hard Target 2 if only for good writers
3. I'm a huge Scott's fan and I wish he could work with better scripts