Harry Potter Vs The Lord of the Rings
Harry Potter VERSUS LOTR
Subscribe:
No fantasy film series can compare to those created from the works of visionaries J.R.R. Tolkien and J.K. Rowling. Join as we pit “The Lord of the Rings” films against the “Harry Potter”.
you can't compare those two harry potter is good but… lotr is massive. If you know the lore well enough you can't have any doubts lotr is superior to this later work in every aspect. And if you are to take a look on the way those books are wrothe, i mean Tolkien work change the future of fantasy showing it can be more than what meet the eyes and it is write for those who can read not only for child. But I love both and harry potter steel a realy good story but not enough to be compare to the massive work of Tolkien.
lets be real here. if Voldemort was put into the real world he would be able to destroy it so easily. sauron could only destroy middle earth because there are no people in middle earth with the same powers as sauron where as Voldemort has no many wizards with great powers. Voldemort comes from a world of magic. and think about it! all it would take is one spell and the whole of the orks and urks would be absolutely destroyed
Ok, I don't think it is a good idea to compare those incredible movies to each other….
To be honest LOTR beats HP on everything…
Sauron ruled half of middle earth. Voldemort couldn’t even take over a public boarding school full of children. Mass shooters have accomplished more than he could. Ok I have gone too far.
Please make more videos like this
Alright, here's between both. 1. They are both successful. 2. Lotr has a lot of oscars and while harry potter has none and will never had one, ever since. Boom! Mine power. But I like them, both.
Are you fucking crazy? How the fuck is Sauron weaker than Voldemort?!
LOTR>>>Harry Potter
J.K. Rowling ripped off LOTR… There I said it… And you know it's damn well true!
LOTR/Hobbit wins 4-1
HP gets the point for protagonist
Harry potter antagonists arę worse than lotr
F*** THIS!! HARRY POTTER IS BETTER!!!!
lord of the ring is like the best,but hp is the best,too,so boo this video
Watch the Voldemort vs. Sauron video and who won that? As for the protagonist… How is Frodo the obvious choice? The whole series constantly reminds us. "Oh, why should a small, weak, insignificant Hobbit carry the ring? Give it to Boromir, a man who can take action." Also, Harry almost died as a baby and again later on, Frodo, is practically near death the entire time. He leaves all protection behind and is losing his soul and himself to the ring. Not to mention how many times he gets captured. Shelob, the orcs, Gondor for awhile, Boromir, Gollum, the nazgul, etc. I could go on. Harry, you did a good job, but you take home the silver medal in a two person race.
For visual affects did you even consider the spells HARRY POTTER IS WAY BETTER GO BACK AND REID THE BOOKS AND WATCH THE MOVIES DUMBLEDOOR IS THE GOAT (greatest of all time)
HARRY POTTER IS WAY BETTER
Lotr is the best
HELL YEAH! sorry sisters- I've gone to Middle Earth-
Sorry, but this video is rubbish! Everybody is free to believe whatever he/she wants! I don't agree with you. I just think you only thought at your preferences.
Unsubscribe
Yes, I knew that The Lord Of The Rings was the winner.
No you like lord of the rings like watchmojouk
ahaha so easy harry potter is better
YES, 5/8 Harry Potter films are not that great, but the writing of the books is just more inspiring than LOTR. GANDALF FIGHTS WITH A SWORD(HE IS A WIZARD)…
Why are people saying that Voldemort failed to take over a school?
It's not true. He already had the school under control, but the school became Rebellious.
Now, don't moan about Voldemort not being able to hold a Rebellion. There are countless of Famous Kings and Queens in history who failed, just like him.
Can I ask, how the fuck was "adaptation of the source books" not a round here? I mean, surely one of the important things when judging the franchise, not the movies as it was clearly said at the beginning by mentioning the authors, is how accurate and reliable it actually is? Harry potter was far more accurate in that sense. Also, if you love lotr, fair enough, but Frodo did actually need a lot or hand holding, as opposed to what was said. I won't go into detail, it would just be rude to critique the story like that, but over all, Harry Potter is much better (in my opinion.) The pace of both the books and movies was much better. I began reading lord of the rings but stopped when practically nothing happened for like 100 pages. The movies were the same thing. These rounds are really niche and a formed in a way that caused lotr to win. I can't deny the land was incredible or that the entourage did a lot of things from themselves, but there are so many other things that are more commonly judged when deciding what movie is better rather than CGI.
no just no hp for life